Paper detail

Scheduling Observers Over a Shared Channel with Hard Delivery Deadlines

We abstract the core logical functions from applications that require ultra-low-latency wireless communications to provide a novel definition for reliability. Real-time applications -- such as intelligent transportation, remote surgery, and industrial automation -- involve a significant element of control and decision making. Such systems involve three logical components: observers (e.g. sensors) measuring the state of an environment or dynamical system, a centralized executive (e.g. controller) deciding on the state, and agents (e.g. actuators) that implement the executive's decisions. The executive harvests the observers' measurements and decides on the short-term trajectory of the system by instructing its agents to take appropriate actions. All observation packets (typically uplink) and action packets (typically downlink) must be delivered by hard deadlines to ensure the proper functioning of the controlled system. In-full on-time delivery cannot be guaranteed in wireless systems due to inherent uncertainties in the channel such as fading and unpredictable interference; accordingly, the executive will have to drop some packets. We develop a novel framework to formulate the observer selection problem (OSP) through which the executive schedules a sequence of observations that maximize its knowledge about the current state of the system. To solve this problem efficiently yet optimally, we devise a branch-and-bound algorithm that systematically prunes the search space. Our work is different from existing work on real-time communications in that communication reliability is not conveyed by packet loss or error rate, but rather by the extent of the executive's knowledge about the state of the system it controls.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.