Paper detail

Scattering line polarization in rotating, optically thick disks

To interpret observations of astrophysical disks it is essential to understand the formation process of the emitted light. If the disk is optically thick, scattering dominated and permeated by a Keplerian velocity field, Non-Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium radiative transfer modeling must be done to compute the emergent spectrum from a given disk model. We investigate Non-local thermodynamic equilibrium polarized line formation in different simple disk models and aim to demonstrate the importance of both radiative transfer effects and scattering as well as the effects of velocity fields. We self-consistently solve the coupled equations of radiative transfer and statistical equilibrium for a two level atom model by means of Jacobi iteration. We compute scattering polarization, that is Q/I and U/I line profiles. The degree of scattering polarization is significantly influenced by the inclination of the disk with respect to observer, but also by the optical thickness of the disk and the presence of rotation. Stokes U shows double-lobed profiles with amplitude which increases with the disk rotation. Our results suggest that the line profiles, especially the polarized ones, emerging from gaseous disks differ significantly from the profiles predicted by simple approximations. The profiles are diverse in shape, but typically symmetric in Stokes Q and antisymmetric in Stokes U. A clear indicator of disk rotation is the presence of Stokes U, which might prove to be a useful diagnostic tool. We also demonstrate that, for moderate rotational velocities, an approximate treatment can be used, where non-local thermodynamic equilibrium radiative transfer is done in the velocity field-free approximation and Doppler shift is applied in the process of spatial integration over the whole emitting surface.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.