Paper detail

Scattering experiments meet N-body I: a practical recipe for the evolution of massive black hole binaries in stellar environments

The N-independence observed in the evolution of massive black hole binaries (MBHBs) in recent simulation of merging stellar bulges suggests a simple interpretation beyond complex time-dependent relaxation processes. We conjecture that the MBHB hardening rate is equivalent to that of a binary immersed in a field of unbound stars with density $ρ$ and typical velocity $σ$, provided that $ρ$ and $σ$ are the stellar density and the velocity dispersion at the influence radius of the MBHB. By comparing direct N-body simulations to an hybrid model based on 3-body scattering experiments, we verify this hypothesis: when normalized to the stellar density and velocity dispersion at the binary influence radius, the N-body MBHB hardening rate approximately matches that predicted by 3-body scatterings in the investigated cases. The eccentricity evolution obtained with the two techniques is also in reasonable agreement. This result is particularly practical because it allows to estimate the lifetime of MBHBs forming in dry mergers based solely on the stellar density profile of the host galaxy. We briefly discuss some implications of our finding for the gravitational wave signal observable by pulsar timing arrays and for the expected population of MBHBs lurking in massive ellipticals.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.