Paper detail

Scattered Light Correction of HAYABUSA/AMICA Data and Quantitative Spectral Comparisons of Itokawa

The Hayabusa spacecraft rendezvoused with its target asteroid 25143 Itokawa in 2005 and brought an asteroidal sample back to the Earth in 2010. The onboard camera, AMICA, took more than 1400 images of Itokawa during the rendezvous phase. It was reported that the AMICA images were severely contaminated by light scatter inside the optics. The effect made it difficult to produce the color maps at longer wavelengths (>800 nm). In this paper, we demonstrate a method to subtract the scattered light by investigating the dim halos of Itokawa and the Moon taken by AMICA during the inflight operation. As the result, we found that the overall data reduction scheme including the scattered light correction enables to recognize ~3% regional differences in the relative reflectance spectra of Itokawa. We confirmed that the color variation in Itokawa was largely attributed to space weathering.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.