Paper detail

Scatter in Sunyaev--Zel'dovich effect scaling relations explained by inter-cluster variance in mass accretion histories

X-ray and microwave cluster scaling relations are immensely valuable for cosmological analysis. However, their power is limited by astrophysical systematics that bias mass estimates and introduce additional scatter. Turbulence injected into the intracluster medium via mass assembly contributes substantially to cluster non-thermal pressure support, a significant source of such uncertainties. We use an analytical model to compute the assembly-driven non-thermal pressure profiles of haloes based on Monte Carlo-generated accretion histories. We introduce a fitting function for the average non-thermal pressure fraction profile, which exhibits minimal dependence on redshift at fixed peak height. Using the model, we predict deviations from self-similarity and the intrinsic scatter in the Sunyaev--Zel'dovich effect observable-mass scaling relation ($Y_\mathrm{SZ}-M$) due solely to inter-cluster variation in mass accretion histories. We study the dependence of $Y_\mathrm{SZ}-M$ on aperture radius, cosmology, redshift, and mass limit. The model predicts $5-9\%$ scatter in $Y_\mathrm{SZ}-M$ at $z=0$, increasing as the aperture used to compute $Y_\mathrm{SZ}$ increases from $R_\mathrm{500c}$ to $5R_\mathrm{500c}$. The predicted scatter lies slightly below that of studies based on non-radiative hydro-simulations, illustrating that assembly history variance is likely responsible for a substantial fraction of scatter in $Y_\mathrm{SZ}-M$. This should be regarded as a lower bound, which will likely increase with the use of an updated gas density model that incorporates a more realistic response to halo assembly. As redshift increases, $Y_\mathrm{SZ}-M$ deviates more from self-similarity and scatter increases. We show that the $Y_\mathrm{SZ}-M$ residuals correlate strongly with the recent halo mass accretion rate, potentially providing an opportunity to infer the latter.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.