Paper detail

Scaling transition in horizontal convection near the density maximum

Horizontal convection (HC) serves as a canonical model for geophysical and industrial flows driven by differential heating along a surface. While the classical Oberbeck-Boussinesq (OB) approximation is well-established, the impact of a nonlinear equation of state, specifically the density maximum of water near $4^\circ\mathrm{C}$, remains underexplored. This study investigates Non-Oberbeck-Boussinesq (NOB) effects on HC via direct numerical simulations (DNS) over a Rayleigh number range of $10^6 \le Ra \le 5\times 10^{10}$. We examine two configurations: Classical HC (CHC) and Symmetric HC (SHC). Our results reveal that the NOB-SHC case undergoes a structural transition, evolving from a bicellular structure to a full-depth, single-roll circulation driven by central `mixing plumes'. This reorganization manifests as transitional anomalies in Reynolds number ($Re$) scaling, whereas the emergence of full-depth plumes fundamentally alters the heat transport mechanism. Consequently, unlike the classical Rossby scaling ($Nu \sim Ra^{1/5}$) observed in reference cases, the NOB-SHC regime exhibits an enhanced heat transport scaling ranging from $Nu \sim Ra^{1/4}$ to $Ra^{1/3}$. To rationalize this behavior, we extend the Shishkina-Grossmann-Lohse (SGL) theory by incorporating a generalized potential energy transfer term ($Φ_{i2}$). The theoretical framework demonstrates that the global scaling law is dictated by the characteristic plume height ($\hat{z}$). Specifically, when plumes penetrate the entire cavity depth ($\hat{z} \sim H$), as observed in the NOB-SHC case, the flow transcends classical bounds for OB HC, accessing a regime analogous to Rayleigh Bénard convection. The proposed theory successfully unifies the scaling laws for both OB and NOB fluids, showing excellent agreement with numerical data.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.