Paper detail

Scaling the smoothness of the IGM

We use, for the first time, the Detrend Fluctuation Analysis (DFA) to study the correlation properties of the transmitted flux fluctuations, in the Lyman-$α$ (Ly$α$) Forest along the lines of sight (LOS) to QSOs, at different space scales. We consider in our analysis the transmitted flux in the intergalactic medium over the redshift range 2 $\leq$ z $\leq$ 4.5 from a sample of 45 high-quality medium resolution (R $\sim$ 4300) quasar spectra obtained with Echelle Spectrograph and Imager (ESI) mounted on the Keck II 10-m telescope, and from a sample of 19 high-quality high resolution (R $\sim$ 50000) quasar spectra obtained with Ultra-Violet and Visible Echelle Spectrograh (UVES) mounted on the ESO KUEYEN 8.2 m telescope. The result of the DFA method applied to both datasets, shows that there exists a difference in the correlation properties between the short and long-range regimes: the slopes of the transmitted flux fluctuation function are different on small and large scales. The scaling exponents, $α_{1}$ = 1.635$\pm$ 0.115 and $α_{2}$ = 0.758$\pm$ 0.085 for the ESI/Keck sample and $α_{1}$ = 1.763 $\pm 0.128$ and $α_{2}$ = 0.798 $\pm 0.084$ for the UVES/VLT sample for the short and long range regime respectively. The transition between the two regims is observed at about $\sim 1.4 h^{-1} Mpc$ (comoving). The fact that $α_{1}$ is always larger than $α_{2}$ for each spectrum supports the common view that the Universe is smoother on large scales than on small scales. The non detection of considerable variations in the scaling exponents from LOS to LOS confirms that anisotropies cannot be ubiquitous, at least on these scales.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.