Paper detail

Scaling relations of z~0.25-1.5 galaxies in various environments from the morpho-kinematic analysis of the MAGIC sample

The evolution of galaxies is influenced by many physical processes which may vary depending on their environment. We combine Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and Multi-Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) data of galaxies at 0.25<z<1.5 to probe the impact of environment on the size-mass relation, the Main Sequence (MS) and the Tully-Fisher relation (TFR). We perform a morpho-kinematic modelling of 593 [Oii] emitters in various environments in the COSMOS area from the MUSE-gAlaxy Groups In Cosmos (MAGIC) survey. The HST F814W images are modelled with a bulge-disk decomposition to estimate their bulge-disk ratio, effective radius and disk inclination. We use the [Oii]λλ3727, 3729 doublet to extract the ionised gas kinematic maps from the MUSE cubes, and we model them for a sample of 146 [Oii] emitters, with bulge and disk components constrained from morphology and a dark matter halo. We find an offset of 0.03 dex on the size-mass relation zero point between the field and the large structure subsamples, with a richness threshold of N=10 to separate between small and large structures, and of 0.06 dex with N=20. Similarly, we find a 0.1 dex difference on the MS with N=10 and 0.15 dex with N=20. These results suggest that galaxies in massive structures are smaller by 14% and have star formation rates reduced by a factor of 1.3-1.5 with respect to field galaxies at z=0.7. Finally, we do not find any impact of the environment on the TFR, except when using N=20 with an offset of 0.04 dex. We discard the effect of quenching for the largest structures that would lead to an offset in the opposite direction. We find that, at z=0.7, if quenching impacts the mass budget of galaxies in structures, these galaxies would have been affected quite recently, for roughly 0.7-1.5 Gyr. This result holds when including the gas mass, but vanishes once we include the asymmetric drift correction.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access13 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.