Paper detail

Scaling relations for dark matter core density and radius from Chandra X-ray cluster sample

A large number of studies have found that the dark matter surface density, given by the product of the dark matter core radius ($r_c$) and core density ($ρ_c$) is approximately constant for a wide range of galaxy systems. However, there has been only one systematic study of this {\it ansatz} for galaxy clusters by Chan (arXiv:1403.4352), who found that the surface density for clusters is not constant and $ρ_c \sim r_c^{-1.46}$. We carry out this test for an X-ray sample of 12 relaxed clusters from Chandra observations, implementing the same procedure as Chan, but also accounting for the gas and star mass. We find that $ρ_c \propto r_c^{-1.08 \pm 0.055}$, with an intrinsic scatter of about 18%. Therefore, the dark matter surface density for our cluster data shows deviations from a constant value at only about 1.4$σ$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.