Paper detail

Scaling Relations and X-ray Properties of Moderate-Luminosity Galaxy Clusters from 0.3 < z < 0.6 with XMM-Newton

We present new X-ray temperatures and improved X-ray luminosity estimates for 15 new and archival XMM-Newton observations of galaxy clusters at intermediate redshift with mass and luminosities near the galaxy group/cluster division (M2500 < $2.4\times 10^{14} h_{70}^{-1} M_\odot$, L < $2\times 10^{44}$ erg $s^{-1}$, 0.3< z < 0.6). These clusters have weak-lensing mass measurements based on Hubble Space Telescope observations of clusters representative of an X-ray selected sample (the ROSAT 160SD survey). The angular resolution of XMM-Newton allows us to disentangle the emission of these galaxy clusters from nearby point sources, which significantly contaminated previous X-ray luminosity estimates for six of the fifteen clusters. We extend cluster scaling relations between X-ray luminosity, temperature, and weak-lensing mass for low-mass, X-ray-selected clusters out to redshift $\approx$0.45. These relations are important for cosmology and the astrophysics of feedback in galaxy groups and clusters. Our joint analysis with a sample of 50 clusters in a similar redshift range but with larger masses (M500 < $21.9 \times 10^{14} M_\odot$, $0.15 \leq z \leq 0.55$) from the Canadian Cluster Comparison Project finds that within r2500, $M \propto L^{0.44 +/- 0.05}$, $T \propto L^{0.23 +/- 0.02}$, and $M \propto T^{1.9 +/- 0.2}$. The estimated intrinsic scatter in the M-L relation for the combined sample is reduced to $σ_{log(M|L)}=0.10$, from $σ_{log(M|L)}=0.26$ with the original ROSAT measurements. We also find an intrinsic scatter for the T-L relation, $σ_{log(T|L)}=0.07 +/- 0.01$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.