Paper detail

Scaling Properties of light (anti)nuclei and (anti)hypertriton production in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}} = 200$ GeV

We present the scaling properties of mass number of light (anti)nuclei production in midrapidity Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt {s_{NN}}=200$ GeV based on the PACIAE + DCPC model. It is found that the integrated yield of light (anti)nuclei decreased exponentially with the increase of mass numbers which depends on the centrality, this properties of the system can be described quantitatively by temperature $T$ at hadronic freeze-out, and the model results are consistent with STAR data. Furthermore, we found that the integrated yield of heavier (anti)nuclei per participant nucleon increases from peripheral to central collisions more rapidly than that of $d(\bar{d})$, indicating that the mass scale of light (anti)nuclei production was presented in relativistic heavy ion collisions.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.