Paper detail

Scaling of the Puffing Strouhal Number for Buoyant Jets

Prior research has shown that round and planar buoyant jets "puff" at a frequency that depends on the balance of momentum and buoyancy fluxes at the inlet, as parametrized by the Richardson number. Experiments have revealed the existence of scaling relations between the Strouhal number of the puffing and the inlet Richardson number, but geometry-specific relations are required when the characteristic length is taken to be the diameter (for round inlets) or width (for planar inlets). In the present study, we show that when the hydraulic radius of the inlet is instead used as the characteristic length, a single Strouhal-Richardson scaling relation is obtained for a variety of inlet geometries. In particular, we use adaptive mesh numerical simulations to measure puffing Strouhal numbers for circular, rectangular (with three different aspect ratios), triangular, and annular high-temperature buoyant jets over a range of Richardson numbers. We then combine these results with prior experimental data for round and planar buoyant jets to propose a new scaling relation that accurately describes puffing Strouhal numbers for various inlet shapes and for Richardson numbers spanning over four orders of magnitude.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.