Paper detail

Scaling limits for a class of regular $Ξ$-coalescents

The block counting process with initial state $n$ counts the number of blocks of an exchangeable coalescent ($Ξ$-coalescent) restricted to a sample of size $n$. This work provides scaling limits for the block counting process of regular $Ξ$-coalescents that stay infinite, including $Ξ$-coalescents with dust and a large class of dust-free $Ξ$-coalescents. The main convergence result states that the block counting process, properly logarithmically scaled, converges in the Skorohod space to an Ornstein--Uhlenbeck type process as $n$ tends to infinity. The existence of such a scaling depends on a sort of curvature condition of a particular function well-known from the literature. This curvature condition is intrinsically related to the behavior of the measure $Ξ$ near the origin. The method of proof is to show the uniform convergence of the associated generators. Via Siegmund duality an analogous result for the fixation line is proven. Several examples are studied.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.