Paper detail

Scaling Inference for Markov Logic with a Task-Decomposition Approach

Motivated by applications in large-scale knowledge base construction, we study the problem of scaling up a sophisticated statistical inference framework called Markov Logic Networks (MLNs). Our approach, Felix, uses the idea of Lagrangian relaxation from mathematical programming to decompose a program into smaller tasks while preserving the joint-inference property of the original MLN. The advantage is that we can use highly scalable specialized algorithms for common tasks such as classification and coreference. We propose an architecture to support Lagrangian relaxation in an RDBMS which we show enables scalable joint inference for MLNs. We empirically validate that Felix is significantly more scalable and efficient than prior approaches to MLN inference by constructing a knowledge base from 1.8M documents as part of the TAC challenge. We show that Felix scales and achieves state-of-the-art quality numbers. In contrast, prior approaches do not scale even to a subset of the corpus that is three orders of magnitude smaller.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.