Paper detail

Scaling accretion flow models from BHB to AGN - Why doesn't it work?

Black holes depend only on mass and spin, while what we see from the accretion flow in steady state depends also on mass accretion rate and (weakly) inclination. Hence we should be able to scale the accretion flow properties from the stellar to the supermassive black holes. But the data show significant differences between these two types of systems, suggesting that we are missing some crucial physics in AGN. One of these differences is the soft X-ray excess which is seen ubiquitously in bright AGN, but only occasionally in BHB. Another is the much faster variability seen in the high energy tail of high mass accretion rate AGN compared to that seen in the tail of BHB. We show that while this variability is not understood, it can be used via the new spectral-timing techniques to constrain the nature of the soft X-ray excess. The coherence, lag-frequency and lag-energy results strongly support this being an additional low temperature Comptonisation component rather than extreme relativistically smeared reflection in the 'simple' Narrow Line Seyfert 1 PG1244+026.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.