Paper detail

Scale and curvature effects in principal geodesic analysis

There is growing interest in using the close connection between differential geometry and statistics to model smooth manifold-valued data. In particular, much work has been done recently to generalize principal component analysis (PCA), the method of dimension reduction in linear spaces, to Riemannian manifolds. One such generalization is known as principal geodesic analysis (PGA). This paper, in a novel fashion, obtains Taylor expansions in scaling parameters introduced in the domain of objective functions in PGA. It is shown this technique not only leads to better closed-form approximations of PGA but also reveals the effects that scale, curvature and the distribution of data have on solutions to PGA and on their differences to first-order tangent space approximations. This approach should be able to be applied not only to PGA but also to other generalizations of PCA and more generally to other intrinsic statistics on Riemannian manifolds.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.