Paper detail

Scalar spectral index in the presence of Primordial Black Holes

We study the possibility of reheating the universe in its early stages through the evaporation of Primordial Black Holes (PBHs) that are formed due to the collapse of the inhomogeneities that were generated during inflation. By using the current results of the baryon-photon ratio obtained from BBN and CMB observations, we impose constraints on the spectral index of perturbations on those small scales that cannot be estimated through CMB anisotropy and CMB distortions. The masses of the PBHs constrained in this study lie in the range of $10^{9}$ and $10^{11}$g, which corresponds to those PBHs whose maximal evaporation took place during the redshifts $10^{6} < z < 10^{9}$. It is shown that the upper bound on the scalar spectral index, $ n_{s}$ can be constrained for a given threshold value, $ ζ_{\rm th}$, of the curvature perturbations for PBHs formation. Using Planck results for cosmological parameters we obtained $n_{s} < 1.309 $ for $ ζ_{\rm th} =0.7 $ and $ n_{s} < 1.334 $ for $ ζ_{\rm th} = 1.2 $ respectively. The density fraction that has contributed to the formation of Primordial Black Holes has also been estimated.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.