Paper detail

Scalable Reliability Modelling of RAID Storage Subsystems

Reliability modelling of RAID storage systems with its various components such as RAID controllers, enclosures, expanders, interconnects and disks is important from a storage system designer's point of view. A model that can express all the failure characteristics of the whole RAID storage system can be used to evaluate design choices, perform cost reliability trade-offs and conduct sensitivity analyses. However, including such details makes the computational models of reliability quickly infeasible. We present a CTMC reliability model for RAID storage systems that scales to much larger systems than heretofore reported and we try to model all the components as accurately as possible. We use several state-space reduction techniques at the user level, such as aggregating all in-series components and hierarchical decomposition, to reduce the size of our model. To automate computation of reliability, we use the PRISM model checker as a CTMC solver where appropriate. Our modelling techniques using PRISM are more practical (in both time and effort) compared to previously reported Monte-Carlo simulation techniques. Our model for RAID storage systems (that includes, for example, disks, expanders, enclosures) uses Weibull distributions for disks and, where appropriate, correlated failure modes for disks, while we use exponential distributions with independent failure modes for all other components. To use the CTMC solver, we approximate the Weibull distribution for a disk using sum of exponentials and we confirm that this model gives results that are in reasonably good agreement with those from the sequential Monte Carlo simulation methods for RAID disk subsystems reported in literature earlier. Using a combination of scalable techniques, we are able to model and compute reliability for fairly large configurations with upto 600 disks using this model.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.