Paper detail

Scaffolds: a graph-based system for computations in Bose-Mesner algebras

Let $X$ be a finite set and let $\mathsf{Mat}_X(\mathbb{C})$ denote the algebra of matrices with rows and columns indexed by $X$ and entries from the complex numbers acting on $\mathbb{C}^X$ with standard basis $\{ \hat{x} \mid x\in X\}$. For a digraph $G=(V(G),E(G))$, function $R:[m] \rightarrow V(G)$ with $r_j := R(j)$, and a function $w$ from the arcs of $G$ to $\mathsf{Mat}_X(\mathbb{C})$, we define the "scaffold" $\mathsf{S}(G,R;w)$ as the sum over all functions $φ$ from $V(G)$ to $X$ of the $m$-fold tensors $\widehat{φ(r_1)} \otimes \widehat{φ(r_2)} \otimes \cdots \otimes \widehat{φ(r_m)}$ scaled by the product of the entries $w(e)_{φ(a),φ(b)}$ over all arcs $e=(a,b)$ of $G$. Scaffolds can be used to count, among other things, digraph homomorphisms and association scheme parameters such as generalized intersection numbers. They also arise in the the theory of link invariants and spin models. These diagrams were introduced in the late 1980s by Arnold Neumaier and have been used implicitly by various authors working with association schemes. We revisit results of several authors, rephrasing their proofs in terms of these diagrams and certain rules of manipulation (or "moves") on diagrams. Our goal is to collect and present, in a uniform fashion, Neumaier's original idea extended to tensors and its used by various authors. Sometimes the term "star-triangle diagram" appears for what we, in this paper, call "scaffolds". Restricting to the case where edge weights are chosen from a coherent algebra, we explore the vector space $\mathsf{W}((G,R); \mathbb{A})$ spanned by all scaffolds defined on rooted diagram $(G,R)$ and establish a connection to graph minors. We end with a conjecture about planar scaffolds that draws a connection between association scheme duality and the duality of plane graphs.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.