Paper detail

Sato-Tate theorem for families and low-lying zeros of automorphic $L$-functions

We consider certain families of automorphic representations over number fields arising from the principle of functoriality of Langlands. Let $G$ be a reductive group over a number field $F$ which admits discrete series representations at infinity. Let $^{L}G=\hat G \rtimes \mathrm{Gal}(\bar F/F)$ be the associated $L$-group and $r:{}^L G\to \mathrm{GL}(d,\mathbb{C})$ a continuous homomorphism which is irreducible and does not factor through $\mathrm{Gal}(\bar F/F)$. The families under consideration consist of discrete automorphic representations of $G(\mathbb{A}_F)$ of given weight and level and we let either the weight or the level grow to infinity. We establish a quantitative Plancherel and a quantitative Sato-Tate equidistribution theorem for the Satake parameters of these families. This generalizes earlier results in the subject, notably of Sarnak [Progr. Math. 70 (1987), 321--331.] and Serre [J. Amer. Math. Soc. 10 (1997), no. 1, 75--102.]. As an application we study the distribution of the low-lying zeros of the associated family of $L$-functions $L(s,π,r)$, assuming from the principle of functoriality that these $L$-functions are automorphic. We find that the distribution of the 1-level densities coincides with the distribution of the 1-level densities of eigenvalues of one of the Unitary, Symplectic and Orthogonal ensembles, in accordance with the Katz-Sarnak heuristics. We provide a criterion based on the Frobenius--Schur indicator to determine this Symmetry type. If $r$ is not isomorphic to its dual $r^\vee$ then the Symmetry type is Unitary. Otherwise there is a bilinear form on $\mathbb{C}^d$ which realizes the isomorphism between $r$ and $r^\vee$. If the bilinear form is symmetric (resp. alternating) then $r$ is real (resp. quaternionic) and the Symmetry type is Symplectic (resp. Orthogonal).

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.