Paper detail

Sampling from naturally truncated power laws: The matchmaking paradox

Consider a network of M >> 1 nodes connected by N >> 1 links, in which the distribution of the number of links per node follows a power law with exponent 0<α<1. The power law is naturally truncated due to the fact that N is finite. A subset of m << M nodes is sampled arbitrarily, yielding the sample mean η: The average number of links per node, within the sampled subset. We explore the statistics of the sample mean ηand show that its fluctuations around the population mean ν=N/M are extremely broad and strongly skewed -- yielding typical values which are systematically and significantly smaller than the population mean ν. Applying these results to the case of bipartite networks, we show that the sample means of the two parts of these networks generally differ -- the fact we call "matchmaking paradox" in the title.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.