Paper detail

Sample variance in N--body simulations and impact on tomographic shear predictions

We study the effects of sample variance in N--body simulations, as a function of the size of the simulation box, namely in connection with predictions on tomographic shear spectra. We make use of a set of 8 $Λ$CDM simulations in boxes of 128, 256, 512 $h^{-1}$Mpc aside, for a total of 24, differing just by the initial seeds. Among the simulations with 128 and 512 $h^{-1}$Mpc aside, we suitably select those closest and farthest from {\it average}. Numerical and linear spectra $P(k,z)$ are suitably connected at low $k$ so to evaluate the effects of sample variance on shear spectra $C_{ij}(\ell)$ for 5 or 10 tomographic bands. We find that shear spectra obtained by using 128 $h^{-1}$Mpc simulations can vary up to $\sim 25\, \%$, just because of the seed. Sample variance lowers to $\sim 3.3\, \%$, when using 512 $h^{-1}$Mpc. These very percentages could however slightly vary, if other sets of the same number of realizations were considered. Accordingly, in order to match the $\sim 1\, \%$ precision expected for data, if still using 8 boxes, we require a size $\sim 1300$ --$ 1700 \, h^{-1}$ Mpc for them.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.