Paper detail

Sample path deviations of the Wiener and the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process from its bridges

We study sample path deviations of the Wiener process from three different representations of its bridge: anticipative version, integral representation and space-time transform. Although these representations of the Wiener bridge are equal in law, their sample path behavior is quite different. Our results nicely demonstrate this fact. We calculate and compare the expected absolute, quadratic and conditional quadratic path deviations of the different representations of the Wiener bridge from the original Wiener process. It is further shown that the presented qualitative behavior of sample path deviations is not restricted only to the Wiener process and its bridges. Sample path deviations of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process from its bridge versions are also considered and we give some quantitative answers also in this case.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.