Paper detail

Sample canonical correlation coefficients of high-dimensional random vectors with finite rank correlations

Consider two random vectors $\widetilde{\mathbf x} \in \mathbb R^p$ and $\widetilde{\mathbf y} \in \mathbb R^q$ of the forms $\widetilde{\mathbf x}=A\mathbf z+\mathbf C_1^{1/2}\mathbf x$ and $\widetilde{\mathbf y}=B\mathbf z+\mathbf C_2^{1/2}\mathbf y$, where $\mathbf x\in \mathbb R^p$, $\mathbf y\in \mathbb R^q$ and $\mathbf z\in \mathbb R^r$ are independent vectors with i.i.d. entries of mean 0 and variance 1, $\mathbf C_1$ and $\mathbf C_2$ are $p \times p$ and $q\times q$ deterministic covariance matrices, and $A$ and $B$ are $p\times r$ and $q\times r$ deterministic matrices. With $n$ independent observations of $(\widetilde{\mathbf x},\widetilde{\mathbf y})$, we study the sample canonical correlations between $\widetilde{\mathbf x} $ and $\widetilde{\mathbf y}$. We consider the high-dimensional setting with finite rank correlations. Let $t_1\ge t_2 \ge \cdots\ge t_r$ be the squares of the nontrivial population canonical correlation coefficients, and let $\widetildeλ_1 \ge\widetildeλ_2\ge\cdots\ge\widetildeλ_{p\wedge q}$ be the squares of the sample canonical correlation coefficients. If the entries of $\mathbf x$, $\mathbf y$ and $\mathbf z$ are i.i.d. Gaussian, then the following dichotomy has been shown in [7] for a fixed threshold $t_c \in(0, 1)$: for $1\le i \le r$, if $t_i < t_c$, then $\widetildeλ_i$ converges to the right-edge $λ_+$ of the limiting eigenvalue spectrum of the sample canonical correlation matrix; if $t_i>t_c$, then $\widetildeλ_i$ converges to a deterministic limit $θ_i \in (λ_+,1)$ determined by $t_i$. In this paper, we prove that these results hold universally under the sharp fourth moment conditions on the entries of $\mathbf x$ and $\mathbf y$. Moreover, we prove the results in full generality, in the sense that they also hold for near-degenerate $t_i$&#39;s and for $t_i$&#39;s that are close to the threshold $t_c$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.