Paper detail

Sample average approximation with heavier tails I: non-asymptotic bounds with weak assumptions and stochastic constraints

We derive new and improved non-asymptotic deviation inequalities for the sample average approximation (SAA) of an optimization problem. Our results give strong error probability bounds that are "sub-Gaussian"~even when the randomness of the problem is fairly heavy tailed. Additionally, we obtain good (often optimal) dependence on the sample size and geometrical parameters of the problem. Finally, we allow for random constraints on the SAA and unbounded feasible sets, which also do not seem to have been considered before in the non-asymptotic literature. Our proofs combine different ideas of potential independent interest: an adaptation of Talagrand's "generic chaining"~bound for sub-Gaussian processes; "localization"~ideas from the Statistical Learning literature; and the use of standard conditions in Optimization (metric regularity, Slater-type conditions) to control fluctuations of the feasible set.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.