Paper detail

Salt parameterization can drastically affect the results from classical atomistic simulations of water desalination by MoS$_2$ nanopores

Water scarcity is a reality in our world, and scenarios predicted by leading scientists in this area indicate that it will worsen in the next decades. However, new technologies based in low-cost seawater desalination can prevent the worst scenarios, providing fresh water for humanity. With this goal, membranes based in nanoporous materials have been suggested in recent years. One of the materials suggested is MoS$_2$, and classical Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulation is one of the most powerful tools to explore these nanomaterials. However, distinct Force Fields employed in MD simulations are parameterized based on distinct experimental quantities. In this paper, we compare two models of salt that were build based on distinct properties of water-salt mixtures. One model fits the hydration free energy and lattice properties, the second fits the crystal density and the density and the dielectric constant of water and salt mixtures. To compare the models, MD simulations for salty water flow through two nanopores sizes were used -- one pore big enough to accommodate hydrated ions, and one smaller in which the ion has to dehydrate to enter, and two rigid water models from the TIP4P family -- the TIP4P/2005 and TIP4P/$ε$. Our results indicate that the water permeability and salt rejection by the membrane are more influenced by the salt model than by the water model, especially for the narrow pore. In fact, completely distinct mechanisms were observed, and they are related to the characteristics employed in the ion model parameterization. The results show that not only the water model can influence the outcomes, but the ion model plays a crucial role.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.