Paper detail

Salpeter normalization of the Stellar Initial Mass Function for massive galaxies at z~1

The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is a key parameter to study galaxy evolution. Here we measure the IMF mass normalization for a sample of 68 field galaxies in the redshift range 0.7 to 0.9 within the Extended Groth Strip. To do this we derive total (stellar + dark matter) mass-to-light [$(M/L)_{\rm dyn}$] using axisymmetric dynamical models. Within the region where we have kinematics (about one half-light radius), the models assume: (i) that mass-follows-light, implying negligible differences between the stellar and total density profiles; (ii) constant velocity anisotropy ($β_{\rm z}\equiv1-σ_z^2/σ_R^2=0.2$); (iii) that galaxies are seen at the average inclination for random orientations (i.e. $i=60^\circ$, where $i=90^\circ$ represents edge-on). The dynamical models are based on anisotropic Jeans equations, constrained by HST/ACS imaging and the central velocity dispersion of the galaxies, extracted from good-quality spectra taken by the DEEP2 survey. The population $(M/L)_{\rm pop}$ are derived from full-spectrum fitting of the same spectra with a grid of simple stellar population models. Recent dynamical modelling results by the $ATLAS^{3D}$ project and numerical simulations of galaxy evolution indicate that the dark matter fraction within the central regions of our galaxies should be small. This suggest that our derived total $(M/L)_{\rm dyn}$ should closely approximate the stellar $M/L$. Our comparison of $(M/L)_{\rm dyn}$ and $(M/L)_{\rm pop}$ then imply that for galaxies with stellar mass $M_\odot \geq 10^{11}$ $M_{\odot}$, the $average$ normalization of the IMF is consistent with a Salpeter slope, with a substantial scatter. This is similar to what is found within a similar mass range for nearby galaxies.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.