Paper detail

Safety and Completeness in Flow Decompositions for RNA Assembly

Decomposing a network flow into weighted paths has numerous applications. Some applications require any decomposition that is optimal w.r.t. some property such as number of paths, robustness, or length. Many bioinformatic applications require a specific decomposition where the paths correspond to some underlying data that generated the flow. For real inputs, no optimization criteria guarantees to uniquely identify the correct decomposition. Therefore, we propose to report safe paths, i.e., subpaths of at least one path in every flow decomposition. Ma, Zheng, and Kingsford [WABI 2020] addressed the existence of multiple optimal solutions in a probabilistic framework, i.e., non-identifiability. Later [RECOMB 2021], they gave a quadratic-time algorithm based on a global criterion for solving a problem called AND-Quant, which generalizes the problem of reporting whether a given path is safe. We give the first local characterization of safe paths for flow decompositions in directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), leading to a practical algorithm for finding the complete set of safe paths. We evaluated our algorithms against the trivial safe algorithms (unitigs, extended unitigs) and the popularly used heuristic (greedy-width) for flow decomposition on RNA transcripts datasets. Despite maintaining perfect precision our algorithm reports significantly higher coverage ($\approx 50\%$ more) than trivial safe algorithms. The greedy-width algorithm though reporting a better coverage, has significantly lower precision on complex graphs. Overall, our algorithm outperforms (by $\approx 20\%$) greedy-width on a unified metric (F-Score) when the dataset has significant number of complex graphs. Moreover, it has superior time ($3-5\times$) and space efficiency ($1.2-2.2\times$), resulting in a better and more practical approach for bioinformatics applications of flow decomposition.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.