Paper detail

SafeRESTScript: Statically Checking REST API Consumers

Consumption of REST services has become a popular means of invoking code provided by third parties, particularly in web applications. Nowadays programmers of web applications can choose TypeScript over JavaScript to benefit from static type checking that enables validating calls to local functions or to those provided by libraries. Errors in calls to REST services, however, can only be found at run-time. In this paper, we present SafeRESTScript (SRS, for short) a language that extends the support of static analysis to calls to REST services, with the ability to statically find common errors such as missing or invalid data in REST calls and misuse of the results from such calls. SafeRESTScript features a syntax similar to JavaScript and is equipped with (i) a rich collection of types (including objects, arrays and refinement types)and (ii) primitives to natively support REST calls that are statically validated against specifications of the corresponding APIs. Specifications are written in HeadREST, a language that also features refinement types and supports the description of semantic aspects of REST APIs in a style reminiscent of Hoare triples. We present SafeRESTScript and its validation system, based on a general-purpose verification tool (Boogie). The evaluation of SafeRESTScript and of the prototype implementations for its validator, available in the form of an Eclipse plugin, is also discussed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.