Paper detail

SAC-AP: Soft Actor Critic based Deep Reinforcement Learning for Alert Prioritization

Intrusion detection systems (IDS) generate a large number of false alerts which makes it difficult to inspect true positives. Hence, alert prioritization plays a crucial role in deciding which alerts to investigate from an enormous number of alerts that are generated by IDS. Recently, deep reinforcement learning (DRL) based deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) off-policy method has shown to achieve better results for alert prioritization as compared to other state-of-the-art methods. However, DDPG is prone to the problem of overfitting. Additionally, it also has a poor exploration capability and hence it is not suitable for problems with a stochastic environment. To address these limitations, we present a soft actor-critic based DRL algorithm for alert prioritization (SAC-AP), an off-policy method, based on the maximum entropy reinforcement learning framework that aims to maximize the expected reward while also maximizing the entropy. Further, the interaction between an adversary and a defender is modeled as a zero-sum game and a double oracle framework is utilized to obtain the approximate mixed strategy Nash equilibrium (MSNE). SAC-AP finds robust alert investigation policies and computes pure strategy best response against opponent's mixed strategy. We present the overall design of SAC-AP and evaluate its performance as compared to other state-of-the art alert prioritization methods. We consider defender's loss, i.e., the defender's inability to investigate the alerts that are triggered due to attacks, as the performance metric. Our results show that SAC-AP achieves up to 30% decrease in defender's loss as compared to the DDPG based alert prioritization method and hence provides better protection against intrusions. Moreover, the benefits are even higher when SAC-AP is compared to other traditional alert prioritization methods including Uniform, GAIN, RIO and Suricata.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.