Paper detail

S-wave superconductivity with orbital dependent sign change in the checkerboard models of iron-based superconductors

We study three different multi-orbital models for iron-based superconductors (iron-SCs) in the solvable limit of weakly coupled square plaquettes. The strongest superconducting (SC) pairing is in the $A_{1g}$ $s$-wave channel and its development is correlated with the emergence of the next-nearest-neighbour antiferromagnetism (NNN-AFM). For the models with more than three orbitals, this study suggests that the signs of the intra-orbital pairing order parameters of the $d_{xy}$ and the $d_{xz}$ (or $d_{yz}$) orbitals must be {\it opposite}. Such sign difference stems from the intrinsic symmetry properties of inter-orbital hoppings and might, ultimately, lead to the sign-change of the SC orders between the hole Fermi pockets at the $Γ$ point and produce anisotropic or even gapless SC gaps in the electron Fermi pockets around the $M$ point in reciprocal space, as restoring back to the homogeneous limit.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.