Paper detail

$S$-parts of terms of integer linear recurrence sequences

Let $S = \{q_1, \ldots , q_s\}$ be a finite, non-empty set of distinct prime numbers. For a non-zero integer $m$, write $m = q_1^{r_1} \ldots q_s^{r_s} M$, where $r_1, \ldots , r_s$ are non-negative integers and $M$ is an integer relatively prime to $q_1 \ldots q_s$. We define the $S$-part $[m]_S$ of $m$ by $[m]_S := q_1^{r_1} \ldots q_s^{r_s}$. Let $(u_n)_{n \ge 0}$ be a linear recurrence sequence of integers. Under certain necessary conditions, we establish that for every $\varepsilon > 0$, there exists an integer $n_0$ such that $[u_n]_S\leq |u_n|^{\varepsilon}$ holds for $n > n_0$. Our proof is ineffective in the sense that it does not give an explicit value for $n_0$. Under various assumptions on $(u_n)_{n \ge 0}$, we also give effective, but weaker, upper bounds for $[u_n]_S$ of the form $|u_n|^{1 -c}$, where $c$ is positive and depends only on $(u_n)_{n \ge 0}$ and $S$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.