Paper detail

S-Lemma with Equality and Its Applications

Let $f(x)=x^TAx+2a^Tx+c$ and $h(x)=x^TBx+2b^Tx+d$ be two quadratic functions having symmetric matrices $A$ and $B$. The S-lemma with equality asks when the unsolvability of the system $f(x)<0, h(x)=0$ implies the existence of a real number $μ$ such that $f(x) + μh(x)\ge0, ~\forall x\in \mathbb{R}^n$. The problem is much harder than the inequality version which asserts that, under Slater condition, $f(x)<0, h(x)\le0$ is unsolvable if and only if $f(x) + μh(x)\ge0, ~\forall x\in \mathbb{R}^n$ for some $μ\ge0$. In this paper, we show that the S-lemma with equality does not hold only when the matrix $A$ has exactly one negative eigenvalue and $h(x)$ is a non-constant linear function ($B=0, b\not=0$). As an application, we can globally solve $\inf\{f(x)\vert h(x)=0\}$ as well as the two-sided generalized trust region subproblem $\inf\{f(x)\vert l\le h(x)\le u\}$ without any condition. Moreover, the convexity of the joint numerical range $\{(f(x), h_1(x),\ldots, h_p(x)):~x\in\Bbb R^n\}$ where $f$ is a (possibly non-convex) quadratic function and $h_1(x),\ldots,h_p(x)$ are affine functions can be characterized using the newly developed S-lemma with equality.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.