Paper detail

s+is State with Broken Time Reversal Symmetry in Fe-Based Superconductors

We analyze the evolution of the superconducting gap structure in strongly hole doped Ba_{1-x}K_xFe_2As_2 between x=1 and x ~ 0.4 (optimal doping). In the latter case, the pairing state is most likely s+-, with different gap signs on hole and electron pockets, but with the same signs of the gap on the two Gamma-centered hole pockets (a ++ state on hole pockets). In a pure KFe_2As_2 (x=1), which has only hole pockets, laser ARPES data suggested another s+- state, in which the gap changes sign between hole pockets (a +- state). We analyze how ++ gap transforms into a +- gap as x -> 1. We found that this transformation occurs via an intermediate s+is, state in which the gaps on the two hole pockets differ in phase by `phi', which gradually involves from `phi' = pi (the +- state) to phi =0 (the ++ state). This state breaks time-reversal symmetry and has huge potential for applications. We compute the dispersion of collective excitations and show that two different Leggett-type phase modes soften at the two end points of TRSB state.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.