Paper detail

RXTE Observations of New Black Hole Candidates XTE J1752-223 and MAXI J1659-152

We report the most recent results of our analysis of X-ray monitoring of new Galactic Black Hole (BH) candidates XTE J1752-225 and MAXI J1659-152 performed by Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE). We investigate various aspects of the RXTE data including energy and power spectra, variability energy distribution and phase lags between soft and hard energy bands. The sources generally exhibit the spectral states and evolution expected from an accreting stellar mass BH. The energy distribution of different variability components show that the aperiodic noise has a spectrum consistently softer with respect to the total rms spectrum, while the spectrum of the quasi-periodic (QPO) features is harder. Particularly interesting behavior is observed in phase lags. Namely, XTE J1753-223 shows that QPO in the hard band lags the QPO in the soft band. This is opposite to what was previously reported in other bright BH candidates and also found in our analysis from MAXI J1659-152. We report the results of BH mass estimations using the spectral-timing correlation scaling technique. Namely, we obtain the BH masses of 9.5 +/-1.5 and 20+/-3 solar masses for XTE J1752-223 and MAXI J1659-152 correspondingly.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.