Paper detail

Running the running

We use the recent observations of Cosmic Microwave Background temperature and polarization anisotropies provided by the Planck satellite experiment to place constraints on the running $α_\mathrm{s} = \mathrm{d}n_{\mathrm{s}} / \mathrm{d}\log k$ and the running of the running $β_{\mathrm{s}} = \mathrm{d}α_{\mathrm{s}} / \mathrm{d}\log k$ of the spectral index $n_{\mathrm{s}}$ of primordial scalar fluctuations. We find $α_\mathrm{s}=0.011\pm0.010$ and $β_\mathrm{s}=0.027\pm0.013$ at $68\%\,\mathrm{CL}$, suggesting the presence of a running of the running at the level of two standard deviations. We find no significant correlation between $β_{\mathrm{s}}$ and foregrounds parameters, with the exception of the point sources amplitude at $143\,\mathrm{GHz}$, $A^{PS}_{143}$, which shifts by half sigma when the running of the running is considered. We further study the cosmological implications of such preference for $α_\mathrm{s},β_\mathrm{s}\sim0.01$ by including in the analysis the lensing amplitude $A_L$, the curvature parameter $Ω_k$, and the sum of neutrino masses $\sum m_ν$. We find that when the running of the running is considered, Planck data are more compatible with the standard expectations of $A_L = 1$ and $Ω_k = 0$ but still hint at possible deviations. The indication for $β_\mathrm{s} > 0$ survives at two standard deviations when external datasets such as BAO and CFHTLenS are included in the analysis, and persists at $\sim 1.7$ standard deviations when CMB lensing is considered. We discuss the possibility of constraining $β_\mathrm{s}$ with current and future measurements of CMB spectral distortions, showing that an experiment like PIXIE could provide strong constraints on $α_\mathrm{s}$ and $β_\mathrm{s}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.