Paper detail

RunnerDNA: Interpretable indicators and model to characterize human activity pattern and individual difference

Human activity analysis based on sensor data plays a significant role in behavior sensing, human-machine interaction, health care, and so on. The current research focused on recognizing human activity and posture at the activity pattern level, neglecting the effective fusion of multi-sensor data and assessing different movement styles at the individual level, thus introducing the challenge to distinguish individuals in the same movement. In this study, the concept of RunnerDNA, consisting of five interpretable indicators, balance, stride, steering, stability, and amplitude, was proposed to describe human activity at the individual level. We collected smartphone multi-sensor data from 33 volunteers who engaged in physical activities such as walking, running, and bicycling and calculated the data into five indicators of RunnerDNA. The indicators were then used to build random forest models and recognize movement activities and the identity of users. The results show that the proposed model has high accuracy in identifying activities (accuracy of 0.679) and is also effective in predicting the identity of running users. Furthermore, the accuracy of the human activity recognition model has significant improved by combing RunnerDNA and two motion feature indicators, velocity, and acceleration. Results demonstrate that RunnerDNA is an effective way to describe an individual's physical activity and helps us understand individual differences in sports style, and the significant differences in balance and amplitude between men and women were found.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.