Paper detail

Rudin-Shapiro-Like Sequences with Maximum Asymptotic Merit Factor

Borwein and Mossinghoff investigated the Rudin-Shapiro-like sequences, which are infinite families of binary sequences, usually represented as polynomials. Each family of Rudin-Shapiro-like sequences is obtained from a starting sequence (which we call the seed) by a recursive construction that doubles the length of the sequence at each step, and many sequences produced in this manner have exceptionally low aperiodic autocorrelation. Borwein and Mossinghoff showed that the asymptotic autocorrelation merit factor for any such family is at most $3$, and found the seeds of length $40$ or less that produce the maximum asymptotic merit factor of $3$. The definition of Rudin-Shapiro-like sequences was generalized by Katz, Lee, and Trunov to include sequences with arbitrary complex coefficients, among which are families of low autocorrelation polyphase sequences. Katz, Lee, and Trunov proved that the maximum asymptotic merit factor is also $3$ for this larger class. Here we show that a family of such Rudin-Shapiro-like sequences achieves asymptotic merit factor $3$ if and only if the seed is either of length $1$ or is the interleaving of a pair of Golay complementary sequences. For small seed lengths where this is not possible, the optimal seeds are interleavings of pairs that are as close as possible to being complementary pairs, and the idea of an almost-complementary pair makes sense of remarkable patterns in previously unexplained data on optimal seeds for binary Rudin-Shapiro-like sequences.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.