Paper detail

RR Lyrae variables in the Small Magellanic Cloud - II. The extended area: chemical and structural analysis

We have performed the Fourier decomposition analysis of 8- and 13-year V-band light curves of a carefully selected sample of 454 fundamental-mode RR Lyrae variables (RRab type), detected in a 14 square degree area of the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) and listed in the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment, phase III, Catalogue of Variable Stars. The Fourier decomposition parameters were used to derive metal abundances and distance moduli, following the methodology described by Kapakos, Hatzidimitriou & Soszyński. The average metal abundance of the RRab stars on the new scale of Carretta et al. was found to be <[Fe/H]C09> = -1.69pm0.41 dex (std, with a standard error of 0.02 dex). A tentative metallicity gradient of -0.013pm0.007 dex/kpc was detected, with increasing metal abundance towards the dynamical center of the SMC, but selection effects are also discussed. The distance modulus of the SMC was re-estimated and was found to be <μ> = 19.13pm0.19 (std) in a distance scale where the distance modulus of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) is μ_LMC = 18.52pm0.06(std). The average 1-sigma line-of-sight depth was found to be sigma_int = 5.3pm0.4 kpc (std), while spatial variations of the depth were detected. The SMC was found to be deeper in the north-eastern region, while metal richer and metal poorer objects in the sample seem to belong to different dynamical structures. The former have smaller scale height and may constitute a thick disk, its width being 10.40pm0.02 kpc, and a bulge whose size (radius) is estimated to be 2.09pm0.81 kpc. The latter seem to belong to a halo structure with a maximum depth along the line of sight extending over 16 kpc in the SMC central region and falling to 12 kpc in the outer regions.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.