Paper detail

RR Lyrae Stars in the Bootes dSph

We present a catalog of 15 RR Lyrae variable stars in the recently discovered Bootes galaxy -- the most metal-poor simple stellar population with measured RR Lyrae stars. The pulsational properties of the RR Lyrae conform closely to period-abundance trends extrapolated from more metal-rich populations and we estimate the distance of Bootes to be (m-M)_0=18.96+-0.12. The average period (0.69 days), the ratio of type c to type ab pulsators (0.53) and the RRab period shift (-0.07) indicate an Oosterhoff II classification for Bootes, a marked contrast to the other dSph galaxies, which are Oosterhoff intermediate. This supports the contention that the Oosterhoff dichotomy is a continuum -- that RR Lyrae properties, to first order, vary smoothly with abundance. The dSph galaxies are not distinct from the Galactic globular clusters, but bridge the Oosterhoff gap. The absence of any anomalous Cepheids in Bootes could indicate the lack of an intermediate age population.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.