Paper detail

RR Lyrae Distance Scale: Theory and Observations

The RR Lyrae distance scale is reviewed. In particular, we discuss theoretical and empirical methods currently adopted in the literature. Moreover, we also outline pros and cons of optical and near-infrared mean magnitudes to overcome some of the problems currently affecting RR Lyrae distances. The importance of the K-band Period-Luminosity-Metallicity (PLZ_K) relation for RR Lyrae is also discussed, together with the absolute calibration of the zero-point. We also mention some preliminary results based on NIR (J,K) time series data of the LMC cluster Reticulum. This cluster hosts a sizable sample of RR Lyrae and its distance is found to be 18.45 +/- 0.04 mag using the predicted PLZ_K relation and 18.51 +/- 0.06 using the PLZ_J relation. We briefly discuss the evolutionary status of Anomalous Cepheids and their possible use as distance indicators. Finally, we point out some possible improvements to improve the intrinsic accuracy of theory and observations.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.