Paper detail

RR Lyrae and Type II Cepheid Variables Adhere to a Common Distance Relation

Preliminary evidence is presented reaffirming that SX Phe, RR Lyrae, and Type II Cepheid variables may be characterized by a common Wesenheit period-magnitude relation, to first order. Reliable distance estimates to RR Lyrae variables and Type II Cepheids are ascertained from a single VI-based reddening-free relation derived recently from OGLE photometry of LMC Type II Cepheids. Distances are computed to RR Lyrae (d~260 pc), and variables of its class in the galaxies IC 1613, M33, Fornax dSph, LMC, SMC, and the globular clusters M3, M15, M54, omega Cen, NGC 6441, and M92. The results are consistent with literature estimates, and in the particular cases of the SMC, M33, and IC 1613, the distances agree with that inferred from classical Cepheids to within the uncertainties: no corrections were applied to account for differences in metallicity. Moreover, no significant correlation was observed between the distances computed to RR Lyrae variables in omega Cen and their metallicity, despite a considerable spread in abundance across the sample. In sum, concerns regarding a sizeable metallicity effect are allayed when employing VI-based reddening-free Cepheid and RR Lyrae relations.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.