Paper detail

Rounding Lasserre SDPs using column selection and spectrum-based approximation schemes for graph partitioning and Quadratic IPs

We present an approximation scheme for minimizing certain Quadratic Integer Programming problems with positive semidefinite objective functions and global linear constraints. This framework includes well known graph problems such as Minimum graph bisection, Edge expansion, Sparsest Cut, and Small Set expansion, as well as the Unique Games problem. These problems are notorious for the existence of huge gaps between the known algorithmic results and NP-hardness results. Our algorithm is based on rounding semidefinite programs from the Lasserre hierarchy, and the analysis uses bounds for low-rank approximations of a matrix in Frobenius norm using columns of the matrix. For all the above graph problems, we give an algorithm running in time $n^{O(r/ε^2)}$ with approximation ratio $\frac{1+ε}{\min\{1,λ_r\}}$, where $λ_r$ is the $r$'th smallest eigenvalue of the normalized graph Laplacian $\mathcal{L}$. In the case of graph bisection and small set expansion, the number of vertices in the cut is within lower-order terms of the stipulated bound. Our results imply $(1+O(ε))$ factor approximation in time $n^{O(r^\ast/ε^2)}$ where is the number of eigenvalues of $\mathcal{L}$ smaller than $1-ε$ (for variants of sparsest cut, $λ_{r^\ast} \ge \mathrm{OPT}/ε$ also suffices, and as $\mathrm{OPT}$ is usually $o(1)$ on interesting instances of these problems, this requirement on $r^\ast$ is typically weaker). For Unique Games, we give a factor $(1+\frac{2+ε}{λ_r})$ approximation for minimizing the number of unsatisfied constraints in $n^{O(r/ε)}$ time, improving upon an earlier bound for solving Unique Games on expanders. We also give an algorithm for independent sets in graphs that performs well when the Laplacian does not have too many eigenvalues bigger than $1+o(1)$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.