Paper detail

Rounding Dynamic Matchings Against an Adaptive Adversary

We present a new dynamic matching sparsification scheme. From this scheme we derive a framework for dynamically rounding fractional matchings against \emph{adaptive adversaries}. Plugging in known dynamic fractional matching algorithms into our framework, we obtain numerous randomized dynamic matching algorithms which work against adaptive adversaries (the first such algorithms, as all previous randomized algorithms for this problem assumed an \emph{oblivious} adversary). In particular, for any constant $ε>0$, our framework yields $(2+ε)$-approximate algorithms with constant update time or polylog worst-case update time, as well as $(2-δ)$-approximate algorithms in bipartite graphs with arbitrarily-small polynomial update time, with all these algorithms' guarantees holding against adaptive adversaries. All these results achieve \emph{polynomially} better update time to approximation tradeoffs than previously known to be achievable against adaptive adversaries.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.