Paper detail

Rotational Tunneling States and the Non-Debye Specific Heat of Dipolar Glasses

Specific heat of dipolar glasses does not obey Debye law. It is of interest to know if the non-Debye specific heat can be accounted for in terms of Schottky-type specific heat arising from rotational tunneling states of the dipoles. This paper deals with rotational tunneling spectra of NH$_{4}^{+}$ ions and the non-Debye specific heat of mixed salts (e.g. (NH$_{4})_{x}$Rb$_{1-x}$Br) of ammonium and alkali halides which are known to exhibit dipolar glass phase. We have measured specific heat of above mixed salts at low temperatures (1.5 K $< T <$ 15 K). It is seen that while the specific heat of pure salts obeys Debye law, the specific heat of mixed salts does not obey Debye law. We have studied the effect of the NH$_{4}^{+}$ ion concentration, first neighbor environment of NH$_{4}^{+}$ ion and the lattice strain field on the non-Debye specific heat by carrying out measurements on suitably chosen mixed salts. Independent of above, we have measured the rotational tunneling spectra, $f(ω$), of the NH$_{4}^{+}$ ions in above salts using technique of neutron incoherent inelastic scattering. The above studies show that both the non-Debye specific heat and the tunneling spectra of the NH$_{4}^{+}$ ions depend on the NH$_{4}^{+}$ ion concentration, first neighbor environment of NH$_{4}^{+}$ ions and the lattice strain field. We have further shown that the temperature dependence of the measured specific heat can be explained for all the samples in terms of a model that takes account of contributions to the specific heat from the Debye phonons and the rotational tunneling states of the NH$_{4}^{+}$ ions. To the best of our knowledge, this is a first study where it is shown that measured specific heat of (NH$_{4})_{x}$Rb$_{1-x}$Br can be quantitatively explained in terms of an experimentally measured rotational tunneling spectra $f(ω$) of the NH$_{4}^{+}$ ions.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.