Paper detail

Rotational evolution of slow-rotators sequence stars

The observed mass-age-rotation relationship in open clusters shows the progressive development of a slow-rotators sequence. The observed clustering on this sequence suggests that it corresponds to some equilibrium or asymptotic condition that still lacks a complete theoretical interpretation, crucial to our understanding of the stellar angular momentum evolution. We couple a rotational evolution model, which takes into account internal differential rotation, with classical and new proposals for the wind braking law, and fit models to the data using a MCMC method. The description of the evolution of the slow-rotators sequence requires taking into account the transfer of angular momentum from the radiative core to the convective envelope; we find that, in the mass range 0.85-1.10 $M_{\odot}$, the core-envelope coupling time-scale for stars in the slow-rotators sequence scales as $M^{-7.28}$. Quasi-solid body rotation is achieved only after 1-2 Gyr, depending on stellar mass, which implies that observing small deviations from the Skumanich law ($P \propto \sqrt{t}$) would require period data of older open clusters than available to date. The observed evolution in the 0.1-2.5 Gyr age range and in the 0.85-1.10 $M_{\odot}$ mass range is best reproduced by assuming an empirical mass dependence of the wind angular momentum loss proportional to the convective turnover time-scale and to the stellar moment of inertia. Period isochrones based on our MCMC fit provide a tool for inferring stellar ages of solar-like main-sequence stars from their mass and rotation period largely independent from the wind braking model adopted. These effectively represent gyro-chronology relationships that take into account the physics of the two-zone model for the stellar angular momentum evolution.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.