Paper detail

Rotational disruption of dust grains by mechanical torques for high-velocity gas-grain collisions

Dust grains moving at hypersonic velocities of $v_{d}\gtrsim 100\rm km~s^{-1}$ through an ambient gas are known to be destroyed by nonthermal sputtering. Yet, previous studies of nonthermal sputtering disregarded the fact that dust grains can be spun-up to suprathermal rotation by stochastic mechanical torques from gas-grain collisions. In this paper, we show that such grain suprathermal rotation can disrupt a small grain into small fragments because induced centrifugal stress exceeds the maximum tensile strength of grain material, $S_{\rm max}$. We term this mechanism {\it MEchanical Torque Disruption} (METD). We find that METD is more efficient than nonthermal sputtering in destroying smallest grains ($a<10$ nm) of nonideal structures moving with velocities of $v_{d}<500 \rm km~s^{-1}$. The ratio of rotational disruption to sputtering time is $τ_{\rm disr}/τ_{\rm sp}\sim 0.7(S_{\rm max}/10^{9}\rm erg~cm^{-3})(\bar{A}_{\rm sp}/12)(Y_{\rm sp}/0.1)(a/0.01μm)^{3}(300\rm km~s^{-1}/v_{d})^{2}$ where $a$ is the radius of spherical grains, and $Y_{\rm sp}$ is sputtering yield. We also consider the high-energy regime and find that the rate of METD is reduced and becomes less efficient than sputtering for $v_{d}>500\rm km~s^{-1}$ because impinging particles only transfer part of their momentum to the grain. We finally discuss implications of the METD mechanism for the destruction of hypersonic grains accelerated by radiation pressure as well as grains in fast shocks. Our results suggest that the destruction of small grains by METD in fast shocks of supernova remnants may be more efficient than previously predicted by nonthermal sputtering, depending on grain internal structures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.