Paper detail

Rotation and differential rotation of active Kepler stars

We present rotation periods for thousands of active stars in the Kepler field derived from Q3 data. In most cases a second period close to the rotation period was detected, which we interpreted as surface differential rotation (DR). Active stars were selected from the whole sample using the range of the variability amplitude. To detect different periods in the light curves we used the Lomb-Scargle periodogram in a pre-whitening approach to achieve parameters for a global sine fit. The most dominant periods from the fit were ascribed to different surface rotation periods, but spot evolution could also play a role. Due to the large number of stars the period errors were estimated in a statistical way. We thus cannot exclude the existence of false positives among our periods. In our sample of 40.661 active stars we found 24.124 rotation periods $P_1$ between 0.5-45 days. The distribution of stars with 0.5 < B-V < 1.0 and ages derived from angular momentum evolution that are younger than 300 Myr is consistent with a constant star-formation rate. A second period $P_2$ within $\pm30$% of the rotation period $P_1$ was found in 18.619 stars (77.2%). Attributing these two periods to DR we found that the relative shear $α=ΔΩ/Ω$ increases with rotation period, and slightly decreases with effective temperature. The absolute shear $ΔΩ$ slightly increases between $T_{eff}=3500-6000$ K. Above 6000 K $ΔΩ$ shows much larger scatter. We found weak dependence of $ΔΩ$ on rotation period. Latitudinal differential rotation measured for the first time in more than 18.000 stars provides a comprehensive picture of stellar surface shear, consistent with major predictions from mean-field theory. To what extent our observations are prone to false positives and selection bias is not fully explored, and needs to be addressed using more Kepler data.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.

Rotation and differential rotation of active Kepler stars | BZPEER | BZPEER