Paper detail

Rotation and Convective Core Overshoot in theta Ophiuchi

(abridged) Recent work on several beta Cephei stars has succeeded in constraining both their interior rotation profile and their convective core overshoot. In particular, a recent study focusing on theta$ Oph has shown that a convective core overshoot parameter of alpha = 0.44 is required to model the observed pulsation frequencies, significantly higher than for other stars of this type. We investigate the effects of rotation and overshoot in early type main sequence pulsators, and attempt to use the low order pulsation frequencies to constrain these parameters. This will be applied to a few test models and theta Oph. We use a 2D stellar evolution code and a 2D linear adiabatic pulsation code to calculate pulsation frequencies for 9.5 Msun models. We calculate low order p-modes for models with a range of rotation rates and convective core overshoot parameters. Using these models, we find that the convective core overshoot has a larger effect on the pulsation frequencies than the rotation, except in the most rapidly rotating models considered. When the differences in radii are accounted for by scaling the frequencies, the effects of rotation diminish, but are not entirely accounted for. We find that increasing the convective core overshoot decreases the large separation, while producing a slight increase in the small separations. We created a model frequency grid which spanned several rotation rates and convective core overshoot values. Using a modified chi^2 statistic, we are able to recover the rotation velocity and core overshoot for a few test models. Finally, we discuss the case of the beta Cephei star theta Oph. Using the observed frequencies and a fixed mass and metallicity, we find a lower overshoot than previously determined, with alpha = 0.28 +/- 0.05. Our determination of the rotation rate agrees well with both previous work and observations, around 30 km/s.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.