Paper detail

Rotating self-gravitating Bose-Einstein condensates with a crust: a minimal model for pulsar glitches

We develop a minimal model for \textit{pulsar glitches} by introducing a solid-crust potential in the three-dimensional (3D) Gross-Pitaevskii-Poisson equation (GPPE), which we have used earlier to study gravitationally bound Bose-Einstein Condensates (BECs), i.e., bosonic stars. In the absence of the crust potential, we show that, if we rotate such a bosonic star, it is threaded by vortices. We then show, via extensive direct numerical simulations (DNSs), that the interaction of these vortices with the crust potential yields (a) stick-slip dynamics and (b) dynamical glitches. We demonstrate that, if enough momentum is transferred to the crust from the bosonic star, then the vortices are expelled from the star and the crust's angular momentum $J_c$ exhibits features that can be interpreted naturally as glitches. From the time series of $J_c$, we compute the cumulative probability distribution functions (CPDFs) of event sizes, event durations, and waiting times. We show that these CPDFs have signatures of self-organized criticality (SOC), which have been seen in observations on pulsar glitches.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.